AMLSentry

MONITORING DESK 13

AML operations / evidence before escalation

See the reason
behind the signal.

AMLSentry brings transaction monitoring, sanctions screening and regulatory reporting into an evidence-led workspace for banks and payment companies.

Inspect a sample transaction ↓

Signals support investigation. They are not conclusions on their own.

02 / Transaction narrative

Follow the behaviour, not just the alert count.

This fictional timeline demonstrates how monitoring reasons can stay attached to a transaction story.

CASEAML–0137Sample record

08:14 / Account activity

Regular incoming transfer recorded.

The amount and source are consistent with this fictional account’s recent pattern.

NORMAL CONTEXT
Investigator note

No review reason at this event.

03 / Screening layers

Different checks. Different reasons. One review record.

SANCTIONS / 01

Screen names with traceable matching context.

Present potential matches, aliases and confidence cues for trained reviewers rather than hiding them behind a single colour.

NAME + LIST CONTEXT
TRANSACTIONS / 02

Connect rules to the behaviour that triggered them.

Keep amounts, timing, counterparties and the relevant scenario together for investigation.

EVENT + REASON
CASEWORK / 03

Keep ownership and decisions reviewable.

Record hand-offs, evidence requests and closure rationale in the same case narrative.

OWNER + DECISION

04 / Regulatory reporting

Assemble the record without rewriting the investigation.

  1. 01Bring verified case facts forward

    Reuse reviewed information while keeping its source visible.

  2. 02Complete required reporting fields

    Separate incomplete information from information that does not apply.

  3. 03Preserve submission history

    Keep preparation, review and reporting events in an accountable trail.

05 / Operations conversation

Where does your review process lose context?